RE: New Evidence for Multiverse from Planck Scientist
December 16, 2017 at 1:52 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2017 at 1:55 pm by Succubus.)
If I were asked for my definition of the universe I would use this one.
"Everything that exists anywhere".
Now if you have an alternate description it had better be:
1) As pithy as the above.
2) Be very brief.
5) Make sense.
3) Not involve hideously complex mathematics.
4) Or, be highly entertaining, as in some new age woo interpretations.
Regarding no 3. Yes I do understand the various multiverse theories are at base, mathematical constructs.
But fuck off anyway!
"Everything that exists anywhere".
Now if you have an alternate description it had better be:
1) As pithy as the above.
2) Be very brief.
5) Make sense.
3) Not involve hideously complex mathematics.
4) Or, be highly entertaining, as in some new age woo interpretations.
Regarding no 3. Yes I do understand the various multiverse theories are at base, mathematical constructs.
But fuck off anyway!
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.