RE: New Evidence for Multiverse from Planck Scientist
December 16, 2017 at 11:07 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2017 at 11:18 pm by Succubus.)
(December 16, 2017 at 9:39 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(December 16, 2017 at 6:47 pm)Succubus Wrote: I followed that discussion the other week and to be honest I think the cosmos-universe thing is a needless distinction, from my layman point of view anyway.
Edit: this was in reply to Whateverist post # 16
Just curious: is that because you think everything associated with the big bang is everything there is (and if so, why) - or - for some other reason?
Some other reason? What other possible reason? At the risk of repeating myself, I can only repeat myself. You are splitting Planck lengths with this distinction between cosmos and universe, that's the stuff of philosophy not science. Why introduce a confounding factor?
How many theoretical physicists can dance on the lens of a telescope?
The Large Hadron Collider and other wigetry takes us back to 10-43 seconds after the universe began to inflate. We have no knowledge of the universe @ T=0
All else is chalk marks on a blackboard.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
