(August 24, 2011 at 5:06 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You realize that the entire point of TANG was to be refuted right? It was a giant joke on you godly types. If TANG is invalid, so is TAG, they are identical in form and function. TANG simply takes the opposite assumption.
The lesson to be learned; "Is" does not imply "ought". Going from factual claims to ethical claims is fruitless.
(This entire discussion has been facepalm example No2, for those that follow such threads)
It was the very assertion made by Martin that if TANG is refuted TAG is refuted that was refuted decades ago there bub.
