RE: Trolley Problem/Consistency in Ethics
January 24, 2018 at 3:44 pm
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2018 at 3:55 pm by Athene.)
(January 24, 2018 at 3:03 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Wow.... this is about the best version of the problem, that I have seen. I think someone mentioned, that in a common form of the dilemma, one is pushing some fat guy onto the tracks. And at this point, I was fairly confident in my answer... No you can't do that. Changing it to a switch somehow makes it different. But why?
To my mind, there's no essential difference between pushing the fat man onto the tracks and flipping the switch. The presence of the switch in the dilemma simply serves to allow for physical (and emotional) distance in completing the same action.
The idea that it makes the action more ethical/moral is little more than a comforting trick of the mind, IMO; An illusion.
(January 24, 2018 at 12:57 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I'm not even sure New York state's depraved indifference law would require anyone to pull the switch or do the surgery.
I'm confident that depraved indifference laws don't require citizens to "intervene" by way of human sacrifice.