Western terrorism.

[WinterHold]

This shit again Atlas?  You could have at least picked the firebombing of Dresden.  Anyway, since you think god "intervenes"...maybe that's what happened to the ummah?  Allah took one look and said "what assholes" and poof...destroyed.  If you really believe in that sort of shit..the west's complete annihiliation of the islamic empire and subjugation of their society seems like a great candidate for gods will.

Maybe he's angry about all the book worship?  Or maybe he prefers english...and can't stand to go though another day with people praying to him incessantly in arabic?

Earth's people  from the east to the west always seem to elect terrorists, to combat unjustified fear, and gain the illusion of honor and glory.
This combination will drive you to the bottom every time: manipulators play on these two tones every time they want to mobilize people for something evil like WW1 or WW2.

There is a distinction between civilians and military. But all governments -led by the example of WW2- don't agree. Thus; if I happen to live in Arabia, and Hamza decides to fuck with some American civilians using bombs, mad American men come and kill me AND Hamza, just because I am descendant from the same race as Hamza.

That's so barbaric, and so evil. So so evil. But this is the modern art of war, that is not very different from the old, barbaric one. The sin inflated to the degree of having nuclear missiles aimed at every capital in the world.
Earth is ruined. WW3 is the end of us; and all of it is because humans -with a majority- follow the disgusting example of WW2.

---

Instead; Christians ate Mohammed's followers (literally..during the Crusades, Christian cannibals ate Muslim civilians as food).

Evidence, please.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Ma%27arra

The Siege of Maarat, or Ma'arra, occurred in late 1098 in the city of Ma'arrat al-Numan, in what is modern-day Syria, during the First Crusade. It is infamous for the claims of widespread cannibalism displayed by the Crusaders.

---

42,600 burned civilians in a single battle?

Child's play.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of...etinghouse

The US Strategic Bombing Survey later estimated that nearly 88,000 people died in this one raid, 41,000 were injured, and over a million residents lost their homes. The Tokyo Fire Department estimated a higher toll: 97,000 killed and 125,000 wounded. The Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department established a figure of 83,793 dead and 40,918 wounded and 286,358 buildings and homes destroyed.[20] Historian Richard Rhodes put deaths at over 100,000, injuries at a million and homeless residents at a million.

Repaying Pearl Harbor. Even though Pearl Harbor was an attack on military targets.

American casualties and damage

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_...and_damage

Ninety minutes after it began, the attack was over. Two thousand and eight sailors were killed, and 710 others wounded; 218 soldiers and airmen (who were part of the Army until the independent U.S. Air Force was formed in 1947) were killed and 364 wounded; 109 marines were killed and 69 wounded; and 68 civilians were killed and 35 wounded. In total, 2,403 Americans died and 1,178 were wounded.[91][self-published source] Eighteen ships were sunk or run aground, including five battleships.[10][92] All of the Americans killed or wounded during the attack were non-combatants, given the fact there was no state of war when the attack occurred.[23][24][93]

[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor#cite_note-107][/url]
Repaying the deaths of 68 civilians, with the burning of 80,000 Japanese.
Not counting the rest of the attacks.