God is so quiet

[The Grand Nudger]

No, my position is that God could not have failed to exists so existence of some type could not have failed to exists. I have something to ground that belief in. 

Yeah..your belief.  That's all it's grounded in.  It's an assertion of the articles of your faith and nothing more.

It would be up to the atheist to explain everything without logical contradictions.

That's not how any of this works, lol.

Proving that possible worlds semantics must assume existence is a far cry from having an explanatory ultimate for it.

It's not as if god is an explanatory ultimate. Point of fact, it explains nothing at all, so I don't see why it matters.   However, establishing that possible worlds semantics assumes a universe even in the absence of a god does show that there is at least one thing that isn't contingent upon a god no matter how it's asserted.  Ergo god is not a necessary being. This is why a reasonable person does not have to accept the modal operator. It;s not capable of answering the question..any conclusion is a mechanical artifact of ones original assumptions..and there is no basis upon which to judge whether or not any of those assumptions are sound.

You can't use logic to create existence (a concept has no causal power)--you must answer the actual question--why is there something rather than nothing. If you listen to Dean Rickles again, you will notice that he never actually answers the question posed to him. You can say that is a meaningless question, but that is really just part and parcel to admitting you are stuck with a brute fact--a fact you can't explain.

We don't know, and neither do you.  That's how this actually works.  When you can't muster an answer, you just acknowledge that and move on.  Positing gods as a euphemism for ignorance is silly.

Speaking of brute facts, the only valid form of the ontological argument assumes precisely that. What grounds a necessary being or any necessary x, like a universe? Nothing at all. So you're either content with them or you aren;t..but at some point you need to stop contradicting yourself with every other breath while demanding that others iron out the growing pile of misapprehensions you've saddled yourself with.

Here's a fun question, I don't expect you to answer me, here..but I do think you should give it some thought. Why force your god to die on this hill, either left hanging as an assertion or as a non-answer to a potentially meaningless question? You have nothing to gain from doing so and everything to lose. None of the core values of christian theology are impacted by revision in this regard, and it's not as if christianity is incapable of revision in light of new facts or a more accurate knowledge. You're defending your own peculiarities to the detriment of any existent divinity.