Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 15, 2025, 4:03 am
Atheist Forums › Science › Mathematics v
Graham's Number

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Graham's Number
polymath257 Offline
Member
***
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2416
Threads: 5
Joined: January 3, 2018
Reputation: 22
#8
RE: Graham's Number
February 15, 2018 at 9:07 pm
(February 15, 2018 at 6:38 pm)Grandizer Wrote:
(February 15, 2018 at 6:32 pm)polymath257 Wrote: TREE^TREE(G!) (G!)
This could go on forever.....

Damn TREE. Taking all the glory away from Graham's number.

Whatever, it's still mind boggling to me how huge these numbers are that you can't even use exponents to even get anywhere close to representing 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 % of any of these numbers. Even saying "not getting anywhere close" undermines how far away it is.

You can't use exponents to get close to the logarithm of the logarithm of the logarithm  of such numbers!
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Mathematics v
Graham's Number

Messages In This Thread
Graham's Number - by Grandizer - February 15, 2018 at 8:47 am
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 15, 2018 at 9:49 am
RE: Graham's Number - by Grandizer - February 18, 2018 at 10:04 am
RE: Graham's Number - by vorlon13 - February 15, 2018 at 11:14 am
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 15, 2018 at 12:28 pm
RE: Graham's Number - by Sal - February 15, 2018 at 6:23 pm
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 15, 2018 at 6:32 pm
RE: Graham's Number - by Grandizer - February 15, 2018 at 6:38 pm
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 15, 2018 at 9:07 pm
RE: Graham's Number - by Succubus - February 16, 2018 at 8:43 am
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 16, 2018 at 9:13 am
RE: Graham's Number - by Succubus - February 16, 2018 at 9:37 am
RE: Graham's Number - by Grandizer - February 16, 2018 at 9:41 am
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 16, 2018 at 9:46 am
RE: Graham's Number - by polymath257 - February 18, 2018 at 11:18 am
RE: Graham's Number - by Grandizer - February 18, 2018 at 4:58 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is zero a natural number? Jehanne 81 17220 July 16, 2023 at 7:29 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Euclid proved that there are an infinite number of prime numbers. Jehanne 7 1638 March 14, 2021 at 8:26 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  This number is illegal in the USA Aractus 13 5815 May 7, 2016 at 10:51 pm
Last Post: J a c k
  The Magical Number 9 Rhondazvous 25 6694 December 30, 2015 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Tricky Number Sequence Puzzle GrandizerII 16 7137 January 20, 2015 at 2:35 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  Number crunching curios pocaracas 24 11027 January 4, 2014 at 2:14 am
Last Post: Belac Enrobso
  The nature of number jonb 82 45668 October 28, 2012 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: jonb
  number puzzle 1-8 aufis 5 13596 April 24, 2010 at 6:44 am
Last Post: aufis



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)