RE: Graham's Number
February 18, 2018 at 10:04 am
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2018 at 10:08 am by GrandizerII.)
(February 15, 2018 at 9:49 am)polymath257 Wrote: I was thinking about numbers like this on the other thread.
Another one, even larger than Graham's number, it TREE(3).
See
https://joshkerr.com/tree-3-is-a-big-num...390da86d93
Another link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%27s_tree_theorem
So I finally got around to reading the first link, and HOLY FUCK! I didn't even know how badly Graham's number paled in comparison to Tree(3). Tree(3) is to Graham's Number as Graham's Number is to any number that we can conceive of without going insanity to the googolthe power! It's FUCKING HUGE, WAY WAY WAY WAY HUGER THAN GRAHAMS NUMBER!!!!!! It's "makes me want to commit suicide" HUGE (joking, joking, but it almost makes me feel this way).
