(February 22, 2018 at 11:21 pm)Starman Wrote:Good job you can nitpick my spelling and grammar . Too bad that's not a refutation of what i wrote or linked . Just more evidence you have nothing substantive to say.(February 22, 2018 at 8:55 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Nope apologists who's (sic) nonsense has already been criticized to death . Try doing research rather then taking convient (sic) sound bites that reinforce your beliefs .
Your (sic) the only one here friend (sic) that seems angry .
Brilliant. No, really. You atheists are special.
Don't call me "friend" when all you and your pals do is attack and criticize me, and in the present case, with extremely ignorant grammar.
tsk, tsk
(February 22, 2018 at 9:06 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Apologist and out of date
And Darling is an argument from authority and again out of date
Oh ans the Op has taken her out of context
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/lin...e766b51180
Circular reasoning
Yup it's still to big for a god too have wasted so much time and space for one group of semi evolved primates on a speck of dust . But just right if your (sic) an atheist.
Assertion
Oh and the Op does not get what's meant by nothing . But even if we went with his misunderstanding on could still make a logical case
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/468
Oh and six arguments that a multiverse is more likely then (sic) a god
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives.../cosmology
"...your (sic) an atheist"
"more likely then (sic) a god"
You can't even write simple English.
![[Image: 3658.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-9FV1JfC4mcE%2FVkQ5gYAVMiI%2FAAAAAAAAhEM%2FLrbvBNgJYPc%2Fs1600%2F3658.jpg)
![[Image: Deceptive+Argument%3A+Personal+Attack.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=slideplayer.com%2F8432236%2F26%2Fimages%2F42%2FDeceptive%2BArgument%253A%2BPersonal%2BAttack.jpg)
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb