RE: "Sharia law makes a lot of sense" - Linda Sarsour
February 23, 2018 at 1:01 am
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2018 at 1:04 am by polymath257.)
(February 23, 2018 at 12:00 am)Starman Wrote: Your deceptive arguments are your relentless atheist claims of being oh-so-intelligent and rational and scientific.
Despite all this claimed intellectualism, you can't write simple English.
When presented with compelling opinions of scholars, you call them "out of date."
Yes, like Darwin? Since when was calculus "out of date" because it was invented by Isaac Newton?
Absurd, like so many of your flip answers.
Yes, Darwin is out of date. He knew nothing about genetics, for example. And when genetics was combined with Darwini's ideas, those ideas were changed and became a better model of reality.
Yes, Newton's fluxions are out of date also. NO mathematician does things using Newton's methods any longer. Those methods have been improved, extended, and simplified, not to mention put on a much more solid logical foundation (which Newton's ideas did not have). Newton would not have recognized the calculus you took in college (assuming you did).
Yes, Biblical scholars from late 19th and early 20th century are out of date. A great deal of archaeology, as well as literary criticism has been done since them which make almost anything said at that time out of date in the subject.
As for the constants of the universe proving the existence of a creator, do you have *any* evidence those constants *can* be different than they are? (answer: no). Do you have any evidence that they are not in a stable equilibrium of some sort that forces the values we see? (answer: no). Is there any evidence of anything being able to change the values of those constants? (answer: no). Have you investigated any natural processes involved in the setting of the values of those constants? (answer: no).
So, exactly how does that imply a designer?
