(February 23, 2018 at 12:00 am)Starman Wrote: Your deceptive arguments are your relentless atheist claims of being oh-so-intelligent and rational and scientific.
Despite all this claimed intellectualism, you can't write simple English.
When presented with compelling opinions of scholars, you call them "out of date."
Yes, like Darwin? Since when was calculus "out of date" because it was invented by Isaac Newton?
Absurd, like so many of your flip answers.
Poor spelling does not mean poor intelligience. Dismissing an argument because of an issue you have with the person making it is simple ad-hominem and avoiding the debate.
Your second point is another fallacy - the argument from authority. Newton was a genius in terms of mathematics, but that has no bearing on whether his opinions on religion, the mating habbits of the common shrew or any other unrelated topic should be relevant. For example, Thomas Midgley Jr. was a great engineer and chemist, but he also hospitalised himself for a year due to drinking leaded petrol.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
