RE: Actual Infinity in Reality?
February 27, 2018 at 11:50 am
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2018 at 11:57 am by GrandizerII.)
(February 27, 2018 at 11:48 am)Tizheruk Wrote:(February 27, 2018 at 11:44 am)Hammy Wrote: "Everything has limits. Except for non-physical things [what the fuck does that even MEAN? What the hell is a non-physical thing?!]. Just because." sounds an awful lot like "Everything has a cause. Except God. Just because."And now they will start throwing things out like numbers and logic or thoughts etc etc. And arguing those things are not physical because because they don't have certain qualities . Of course it's all bollocks .
You can't divide by 0, therefore 0 is illogical!!!
(February 27, 2018 at 11:50 am)SteveII Wrote: What?!? Conflicting answers (Hilbert, Galileo)
You have been shown several times there are no conflicting answers. Different instances of infinite set are going to yield different results. This is logical, not contradictory.
Same infinite collection - same infinite collection is still 0 (empty collection), and always will be.
It's when you subtract one infinite collection from a different infinite collection that you get other [varying] answers, depending on these collections. It's loosely similar to finite (7) - finity (4) = finity (3) => finity - finity = 3???
And what about 0/0? The answer could be any number, and when we don't know exactly which due to lack of contextual contraints, the answer is that it's indeterminate. Same with infinity - infinity.
