(February 28, 2018 at 10:03 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(February 28, 2018 at 6:11 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: However this doesn't address the dichotomy paradox by Zeno. It's not about motion, or answering how we get from position 0 to position 1.
The whole point of Zeno's paradoxes is that they are arguments against motion, continuous or discrete.
Do you really think that reason that Zeno's paradoxes are still being discussed today, is because a large number of people question motion? Personally, if that is all you are after, then I like the guy who responded by getting up, walked around the room, and sat back down without saying a thing. You are missing or ignoring the larger issue; and why it is being brought up at all.
Quote:I love, by the way, how Steve has not responded to my last response or two and is just repeating the same old bullshit that has long been debunked. So much for intellectual honesty.
Wow.... you had the restraint to wait a response or two, before questioning his intellectual integrity. You should check with that admins; that may be a new AF.org record in the principle of Charity. You should get a cookie or something!
Perhaps it was just lost in the mix of things.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
