RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 7, 2018 at 1:19 pm
(March 7, 2018 at 12:55 pm)LostLocke Wrote:(March 7, 2018 at 11:39 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: In either case, some caution must be used. In observing similar concepts or characteristics; it doesn't follow that there is a connection. Even if Y looks somewhat like X, you need to show why you think the two are connected, it's not enough to just show that they are similar.I actually agree with you, but you need to tell Huggy this.
One might also point out, that you are just pushing the problem back further; and now would be talking about this source which the other was supposedly derived from. Pointing to something else, certainly is an end of one's argument.
He dismisses Odin out of hand because of those points, but Yahweh also has the same issues. So it comes down to an either/or scenario: You can dismiss ANY god that is similar to older ones, or NO god that is similar to older ones. You can't pick one and not apply the standards to another.
It was to all, I just quoted you, because you isolated that part well.
I would agree, that one needs to be consistent in their reasoning and logic. The reasons for one thing, should apply to something similar, unless you can justify with reason, that it should not apply.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther