Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[I_am_not_mafia]

It's like you guys only hear what you want to hear.

Where did I say the audio is of God? I said I had corroborating evidence which consists of a photo, witness testimony, and an audio recording.

You didn't say what any of it was so we had to guess. There's lots of photos and audio corroborating lots of different things. Go to any court and see for yourself.

The photograph is of an unexplained light hanging in mid air over the head of a person, this phenomena has also occurred in the Bible. The photograph has been examined and tested  by the president of The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners George J. Lacy who formerly worked forensics for the FBI. In his official report he stated unequivocally that a light had to be there to form an image on the negative. Off the record he referred to the light as supernatural.

In the audio there is mention of the light moving around and hovering over different people. THIS CORROBORATES THE PICTURE.

There is also video of eye witness testimony who say they saw the light personally. THIS CORROBORATES THE PICTURE AND AUDIO.

So one person has made a claim (scientifically vetted, whatever that means). This is a far cry from a scientific field reaching a consensus and is not the same as corroboration. Corroborating evidence is merely evidence in support of. It is your typical religionist binary thinking that sees evidence as proof.

Now it's up to you to debunk all THREE , not just one like you guys usuall t attempt to do.

Not until you provide the evidence otherwise it's like me asking you to find a flaw in a mathematical proof without actually showing you the workings.

Next time I post It I'm making a new thread where I'm putting all the evidence.

I can't wait.