RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 12:23 pm
(March 8, 2018 at 12:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(March 8, 2018 at 6:24 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Do it.
The photo has to be scientifically vetted by an expert in the field of photography.
I can't wait.
Your photo wasn't scientifically vetted to be a photo of God, it was vetted as not having been retouched (according to 1950 standards). That's not at all the same thing. You're equivocating about what people mean by scientific evidence. Seeing that there was only one photo on the entire roll of film, and there are no contextual clues in the photograph to attest to it being taken when and where it is reported as having being taken, then fraud is a definite possibility. Fraud not involving retouching the photo hasn't been ruled out. Only retouching the photo has evidence against it. But retouching the photo isn't the only way that image could have been created so it hasn't even been scientifically vetted as a mysterious, unexplained floating light.
First of all "scientific examination" was literally stated in the official report.
Also fraud doesn't explain the eye witness testimony or the audio recordings, I'll compile and post it sometime soon.
