Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[Huggy Bear]

Right, so let's think about the process here.

The emulsion is photo-sensitive. The more light there is the whiter it gets.

How can a 'world renowned expert' from the 1950's (Hah!) determine where the light came from to have caused a non-descript blob?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_S..._Examiners

The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners is the world's oldest  society dedicated to the forensic science of questioned document examination with 144 members worldwide. The current president is Jason Lee Miller.

http://www.asqde.org/about/presidents/lacy_g.html

George Lacy was the fifth president of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners and the last of the 15 men who established the organization to be elected to that office.

During Mr. Lacy's early work in law enforcement he arrested Charles Ponzi, the namesake of the Ponzi Scheme.  He began his career in forensic science as a general criminalist and ballistics expert.  As a ballistics expert, he worked on the Bonnie and Clyde case.  He later specialized in questioned document examination.  He was responsible for establishing the Houston Police Crime Laboratory.  Mr. Lacy maintained a private practice in Houston, Texas for many years.

What has the 50's got to do with anything? probes were being sent to the moon in the 50's not to mention people in the 60's (and we haven't been back since), yet all of the sudden people from the 50's are too stupid to know how the science behind a camera works?

This just goes to show the lengths you guys will go to dismiss any evidence (none of you have access to the original negatives, yet somehow you know better than the expert) that doesn't adhere to your worldview, no matter how much scientific verification...