RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 1:55 pm
(This post was last modified: March 8, 2018 at 2:00 pm by Angrboda.)
(March 8, 2018 at 12:02 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(March 8, 2018 at 12:24 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: …and the early church fathers testify to a literal belief in the flood (HERE). That you want to make a strategic retreat from literalism because your bible doesn't square with the facts means absutely squat.
The facts are not as simple as you say and you dishonestly exclude contrary examples that do not justify your bigotry.
First, you failed to included Origen in your list of Church Fathers: http://henrycenter.tiu.edu/2017/04/orige...g-genesis/
I almost forgot. Even Jesus himself treated the flood as literal. If you can't trust an omniscient God on the subject, then who can you trust?
37 For the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the days of Noah.
38 For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark,
39 and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be.
Matthew 34:37-39, NASB
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)