RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 3:31 pm
(March 8, 2018 at 3:22 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Huggy, at the end of the day you have a picture of light. That’s all it ever was, and that’s all it will ever be. You have no evidence that this light is god, let alone the Judeo-Christian god of the Bible. Hell, maybe it’s the light of Odin’s essence trying to communicate to the masses that they’re being mislead by a false religion!). In short, you have evidence of light, and nothing more.
I would agree with that. One might even be able to make a case, that may discount normal natural sources for the light, but in the end, what you have is a light. To go a whole lot further than that, is just speculation with little to none foundation to support it.
One question I would ask, in a situation with a crowd like that, is if the people there witnessed this same event? If only the camera saw it, then that begs the question of why only the camera saw it (similar to if only one person saw it). It may also open up other possibilities as to the source.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther