RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 8, 2018 at 3:55 pm
(March 8, 2018 at 3:45 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 8, 2018 at 3:31 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I would agree with that. One might even be able to make a case, that may discount normal natural sources for the light, but in the end, what you have is a light. To go a whole lot further than that, is just speculation with little to none foundation to support it.Huggy will correct me if I’m wrong, but I do believe several other people in the crowd said they saw some kind of light, but it was only after the priest explicitly said to them something along the lines of, ‘look at the light! Look at it! Do you see it right there hovering over her head?’ I also recall that he was showing a photo of the pillars of fire. Sounds more to me like amateur crowd hypnosis.
One question I would ask, in a situation with a crowd like that, is if the people there witnessed this same event? If only the camera saw it, then that begs the question of why only the camera saw it (similar to if only one person saw it). It may also open up other possibilities as to the source.
Thanks for the info... I'm not really familiar and haven't really been following the story, just commenting on the ideas.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther