RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 8:06 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 8:06 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
(March 9, 2018 at 7:53 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I believe person that examined the negative used the term 'supernatural' im reference to the light, seeing how there was no explanation for the light being there...
He didn't use the term 'supernatural' in the image you linked to. This is an example of you seeing what you want to see.
"no explanation" does not mean there aren't perfectly simple and natural causes that could be explained if we had more data available. All the paper says is that he cannot find any obvious signs of tampering. That is not the same as saying that it wasn't tampered with or that light was not deliberately used to create a halo effect, or even that it wasn't an accident.
Quote:Then you'd have to dismiss eyewitness testimony of a woman who says she saw a hovering light.
Provide the details first and stop being intellectually dishonest:
https://atheistforums.org/thread-53768-p...pid1713658
