RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 11:04 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 11:09 am by Huggy Bear.)
(March 9, 2018 at 10:55 am)Mathilda Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 10:47 am)Huggy74 Wrote: *emphasis mine*
Not really
God is light - 1 John 1:5
So if your god is made from light, how can it interact with the world without us seeing it?
How can something made from light be intelligent?
How can a structure of light (or even any other form of energy) persist without the use of matter?
That's the supernatural part...
(March 9, 2018 at 10:55 am)Mathilda Wrote:You did...(March 9, 2018 at 10:47 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Also an omnitient being cannot increase in intelligence...
Who said anything about increasing in intelligence?
I assume you meant to spell the world omniscient.
(March 9, 2018 at 10:36 am)Mathilda Wrote: Photons do not change. Intelligence require change over time.For I am the Lord, I change not - Malachi 3:6
(March 9, 2018 at 11:00 am)Grandizer Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 10:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Really?
The sun will no more be your light by day, nor will the brightness of the moon shine on you, for the LORD will be your everlasting light, - Isaiah 60:19
And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof. - Revelation 21:23
And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: - Revelation 22:5
We're talking about 1 John here. Why did you jump to other books in order to interpret the verse? And the books you quote here are still full of metaphors and symbolism, lol.
Because you interpret scripture with scripture, that's why.
It doesn't get any more clearer than THE CITY HAD NO NEED OF THE SUN... FOR THE GLORY OF GOD DID LIGHTEN IT.
(March 9, 2018 at 10:54 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: And, there it is. When we don’t have an explanation for the supernatural claims made in the Bible, just reference the Bible! Huggy, you are truely a one-trick-pony.
The sad irony here is that Huggy is incapable of realizing that this failed logic, and ridiculously low standard for “evidence” are exactly what we have been proposing in favor of Odin; a claim that he has essentially dismissed as ridiculous and improbable due to lack of evidence.
However low you believe my standard of evidence to be, none of you has even come close to presenting anything remotely close for Odin, if so, link it.
