Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[downbeatplumb]

Let me refer back to my earlier quote.

---

In the audio there is mention of the light moving around and hovering over different people. THIS CORROBORATES THE PICTURE.

There is also video of eye witness testimony who say they saw the light personally. THIS CORROBORATES THE PICTURE AND AUDIO.

Now it's up to you to debunk all THREE , not just one like you guys usually attempt to do.

For the billionth time, nothing here requires debunking.  There is nothing here that falls outside the realm of science and natural explanation.

1. A priest claims he saw a light.

2. Some other people said they saw a light

3. You have a photo of light.

What you have is corroborating evidence of light. What you do not have, is evidence that the light is God. No one has any actual idea what the source of the light is, but there are in fact more than a few perfectly reasonable and natural possibilities.  You are connecting dots without reason, evidence, or justification because you already believe this god is real, and you believe you’ve got “knowledge” of his nature as it has been fed to you through years of studying the Bible.  

Huggy, you are a living, breathing example of the difference between objectivity and confirmation bias.

Whats this got to do with Odin?