RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 10, 2018 at 8:27 am
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2018 at 8:37 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
(March 10, 2018 at 8:13 am)SteveII Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 8:55 am)Mathilda Wrote: You are assuming that your god exists. There is no evidence to warrant that assumption being made.
Provide one example of something existing that is also supernatural.
Wait a minute. All this started when you thought you had a clever argument that God was not thermodynamically possible.
Right, so let's recap the conversation. I ask
"Give me one single example of intelligence that is not subject to the laws of thermodynamics."
You respond:
"Supernatural intelligence.
By definition, it is not subject to natural laws. "
So I ask:
"Provide one example of something existing that is also supernatural"
You response is:
"Now to salvage your part of the discussion, you take the typical atheist tack of "well...you don't have any evidence of God anyway...so there." "
So to summarise, like all theists, you are using supernatural as an excuse not to explain anything. It's so typical. The argument goes God is supernatural and therefore needs no explanation about how it could possibly exist or do anything. It just gives you an excuse to imagine any old shit because hey, it's supernatural therefore you can't argue that it is implausible or does not exist even though supernatural by definition means that it does not exist in nature. Circular logic indeed.
So when I asked for one example of intelligence not subject to the laws of thermodynamics, you failed to do so and instead responded with an example that you cannot show exists, and which by definition of being supernatural cannot exist. And then when I try to ask you for an example of anything that is supernatural you call me disingenuous..
Or to put it even more succinctly, I ask for an example of something. You provide an example of your god and criticise me for saying that there is no evidence that your god exists.
So having failed to answer the original question, I shall pose it again.
Give me one single example of intelligence that is not subject to the laws of thermodynamics.
