RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 10, 2018 at 12:00 pm
(March 10, 2018 at 11:38 am)Hammy Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 2:49 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: For the billionth time, nothing here requires debunking. There is nothing here that falls outside the realm of science and natural explanation:
1. A priest claims he saw a light.
2. Some other people claim they saw a light
3. There is a photo of light.
What you have is corroborating evidence of light. What you don’t have, is evidence that the light is God. No one knows for certain what the source of the light was, but there are in fact more than a few perfectly natural and mundane possibilities. You’re connecting some serious dots without reason, evidence, or justification because you already believe this god is real, and you believe you’ve got “knowledge” of his nature as it has been fed to you through years of studying the Bible.
Huggy, you are a living, breathing example of the difference between objectivity and confirmation bias.
This post is so fucking epic it hurts.
Lmao! Please include audio commentary with all your posts going forward. I love it.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
