Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[Ravenshire]

Well, for starters

1. "Throwing" is an activity involving matter.
2. "Air" actually is matter
3. "Gravity" would not have an effect on something supernatural

So, by definition alone, I can rule out your analogy. But it does serve to illustrate my complaint about Mathilda's comments. She demands that I defend definitions. I don't have to. She can't show that the concept of 'God' or 'supernatural' is problematic. She is stuck with the possibility that these are exceptions. I don't have to prove their existence to point out these are exceptions. She keeps demanding why? By definition.

This bit right here completely blows up his own argument. He claims that his gawd, an immaterial, supernatural being created all of existence then in point three refutes the very idea that the natural and supernatural can interact.

Way to go there, Stevie.