RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 12, 2018 at 7:34 pm
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2018 at 7:36 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 12, 2018 at 3:51 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Oh, regarding Hickey's missing uterus, the problem isn't that she may or may not suffer from that problem, it's that you, Huggy, jumped to that conclusion. From what my research has shown, Hickey herself has never said what her problem is/was. There are many conditions that can preclude pregnancy. And some conditions can present as others (misdiagnosis is a thing). So, my mockery of you isn't due to me not believing/knowing the condition exists, but rather you insisting - without any proof - that it's what she was miraculously cured of.*emphasis mine*
You ASSume a great many things, Huggy. All without cause.
Regarding 'some discrepancy' between the accounts of Upshaw's 'healing', all we have are those two people's accounts of what may or may not have happened. No other 'witnesses' on the record, as far as I can tell (which is amazing since the 'healing' happened immediately in a church service). Moreover, the account went from "Oh, tell that guy I had a vision, and now he's healed" to "I talked to him directly, had a vision of not only his accident, but a brown suit, and other things, plus I removed the other guy (Kopp) from the story completely." And, of course, there's ample photographic evidence of Upshaw standing without his crutches before the event (he was supposed to be wheelchair bound, yet he was getting in and out of convoys and delivering speeches 3-4 times a day).
Again, you're gullible.
How about posting up your sources, and the photographs instead of popping off at the mouth... After all I've just posted evidence of your dishonesty in the hall of shame.
As far as Hickney is concerned
1. She stated he had an inherited condition that would not allow her to have a baby, which means that someone in her family obviously could not have children.
2. A doctor stated unequivocally that it would be impossible for her to have a child, sure misdiagnosis is possible but not in the case of a missing uterus, having a child is literally impossible.
3. An audio recording confirms the fact that she indeed went and received prayer in order to be healed of her condition, so it's not just her word, there is supporting evidence.
So is stating she had MKRH speculating on my part? Ofcouse I never alluded to it being anything other than than, I'm confident in making that guess based upon the factors I just layed out and the commonalty of the condition.
Scientific principles have been proposed on less.