Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[Ravenshire]

You claim that under any theory of time there exists a set of causal relationships.  But then you go on to put forth descriptions and arguments which are necessarily tied to the A theory of time and so are not in fact applicable "under any theory of time."  Both you and Roady commit this same error.  Either way, you don't appear to have thought this through particularly well.  Perhaps there exists an argument to be made based upon the nature of causation but I'm inclined to believe that if there is, you do not possess it.

That's nit picking. Anyone can rewrite that with ambiguous B-theory-friendly terms. But at least you got a couple of Kudos from your fans. Glad I could help.

---

@steve, no one is obligated to offer defeaters to your premises.  It’s on you to demonstrate they are true, or more likely to be true than not.

First, that smells a little defeatist to me. 

Second, while it seems to me the premises are self evidence, I did offered in the very first post on the KCA which premises you wanted me to defend. Only Vulcan took me up on it. So...there's that...

Since I have the site open...

You and Kalam had better hope this doesn't prove out. If it does, you're both royally fucked.