RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 17, 2018 at 6:57 am
(March 16, 2018 at 8:36 pm)SteveII Wrote:(March 16, 2018 at 6:49 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Efficient causes.
Look at the quote I used above in response to Astreja . Especially the last paragraph where it pulls it all together.
Oh look it happened exactly as expected ...
(March 16, 2018 at 9:30 am)Mathilda Wrote: Oh look, another nebulous term that is not properly defined.
(March 16, 2018 at 12:28 pm)Mathilda Wrote:(March 16, 2018 at 12:14 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: How do you know this?
I bet the answer will be logic.
That's all you have Stevell. Bullshit abstract terms that allow you to equivocate and conflate.
Anybody can argue for anything they want using such terms. For example, that Ford C-Max cars are telepathic, the existence of pixies, for the existence of another religion's god. And if religionists had any solid evidence at all then they wouldn't bother with such nonsense, they'd say, look, this is my god here.
