Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition

[Huggy Bear]

*emphasis mine*

Once again, you're not arguing with me, you're arguing with the dictionary; but what do I know, you're the best debater of the forums

No matter how much mental gymnastics you apply, 'species' and 'kind' are synonymous, no if and or buts.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/species

---

http://www.ligerworld.com/are-the-ligers-sterile.html

And you missed my point entirely

Big surprise

And once again turning to common usage .

---

also love how he ignored the rest of the post .

---

Calling a Genus , Class, Order, and Family subcategories of  species is dumb . And the rest of definitions is just you imposing none biology terms into the mix allowing you to stretch the term as broad as you like .Once again simply putting up dictionary definitions has failed you .Kind is  not biological classification .

The term 'biology' didn't exist until the early 19th century muppet... the scripture existed long before that. I explained how it classified a species, if you don't like it, tough.

---

I didn't post from the bible dummy, I posted from the dictionary.

The comprehension you exhibit when reading my post is on par with the comprehension you exhibit when looking at the dictionary, I see.

I didn’t say you posted from the Bible.  I said you posted words words which appear to you to imply the Bible to be true, but which have no such appearance whatsoever to anyone who is actually qualified to understand their meanings.

Look you mental midget, the OP stated in the title of this thread and in his post that 'kind' is not defined.

This is false because it is clearly defined in the dictionary as being synonymous with 'species', and therefore having the same definition.

This has nothing to do with the bible.

Got it?