RE: Remove Vulgar Thread Titles
March 20, 2018 at 9:56 am
(This post was last modified: March 20, 2018 at 10:00 am by Shell B.)
(March 19, 2018 at 4:24 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(March 19, 2018 at 3:54 pm)Shell B Wrote: As something of an English language expert, I call bullshit. You don't have to plumb the depths of your thesaurus to produce forceful, meaningful, concise language. In fact, it is much preferred that you use a more conversational tone in anything short of technical writing.
Generally I agree. Of course there is a continuum, from a private conversation with a friend to an instruction manual. At the same time, a perfectly good and appropriate Anglo-Saxon word from the Basic English lexicon is almost always available. No one appreciates a David Foster Wallace wanna-be.
And just to be absolutely clear I'm only talking about thread titles where it is already the express intent of the staff that titles be descriptive of the subject to be discussed. We already have a "Click Bait" rule. That's a judgement call also.
(March 19, 2018 at 4:20 pm)Shell B Wrote: Another example is fuck. Fuck can be used a number of ways, none of them are even insulting. They're just too "common" or "vulgar" for the posh types. Fuck can mean to have sex, it can be used as an adjective like very. My point is that the vast majority of swears are completely harmless and carry no extra meaning than their more acceptable synonyms...
Fuck is probably the least descriptive word precisely because it is used as a synonym for a very large number of words with very different meanings. And there is nothing "posh" about avoiding vulgarities. It's about creating a decent environment for all participants. Some graffiti is actually quite evocative and well-executed but I don't want to live in a city where every other building is covered with it.
Buy why is it considered more "decent?" Because it's not the "common" vernacular. It all boils down to people feeling better than other people and being offended for the sake of feeling superior.
(March 19, 2018 at 7:15 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I really don't get why Chad is getting so much crap slung at him from some people. All he did was make a suggestion in the suggestion subforum to keep thread titles a little less vulgar/bigoted. That's the whole point of the subform, and I don't see why anyone seems to feel personally offended by a suggestion for cleaner language in thread titles.
I have a feeling if it had been either me, mooney, or shadow making this same suggestion, we wouldnt be getting attacked for it.
I would have treated you the same way, for what it's worth.
(March 19, 2018 at 9:51 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Uh...Neo? Care to respond to this?
Quote:Threads started by Neo-scholastic.
Tooth Fairy Bullshit
Atheist Douches Object to Gospel Music at MLK Celebration
Of Holes and A-Holes
Oh shit.