Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[I_am_not_mafia]

I used to have a link, of an atheists website, which was taking on some common bad arguments against the KCA.  One of the topics, was what was meant by beginning, and the author had a number of links to older explanations by WLC of what he meant.  Within this, is the idea of change;  a change in description to be exact. A change from !A  to A.   It wasn't spelled out specifically, but I would carry this on even to include such things Newtons first law of motion.   If we have a description of something, the movement (or resting state) of that object is part of that description.  Any change in the motion of that object, requires a cause or an explanation for this change in description.

Was it this? I found it the other day when searching for the phrase "begins to exist".

I really want to know whether quantum mechanics really is stochastic rather than deterministic because I want to know if quantum computing is ever likely to happen in practice.