Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[polymath257]

Do you think 'everything that changes, has a cause' would a fair restatement of the first premise of the KCA?

Off hand, I don't think I have an issue (although perhaps I still prefer the classical vocabulary).  I may have to think about it a bit; if there is a way this may be misunderstood, before committing to it.  In the KCA I think the focus is going from !A to A; so,  perhaps begin to exist is better in that case.

One aspect of this is that there have to be *times* when !A happens and  when A is the case. So both !A and A happen at some time. In other words, time is required for the argument.