RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 20, 2018 at 11:23 am
(This post was last modified: March 20, 2018 at 12:52 pm by possibletarian.)
(March 20, 2018 at 9:15 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:RoadRunner79 Wrote:What I mean, is that I don't see anyone on the opposing side, making the argument that you are attempting to refute. And I'm glad that you think that snowflakes need a reason, for beginning to exist. I agree. And I'm sorry, but since I'm not making the argument that you are trying to refute, I don't really see the need to go into a number of things that cause a snowflake to form.
Um, snowflakes don't begin to exist. They are a re-arrangement of existing matter. If the sense in which you're using 'begin to exist' includes snowflakes forming, then it includes our universe transforming from a previous state of existence.
I think it's fair to say that a definition of an object can become apparent, in other words there is a point where you would say the water formed into what we would call a snowflake. It's a definition that's realised rather than matter becoming to exist.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
