RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 20, 2018 at 12:55 pm
(March 20, 2018 at 12:53 pm)polymath257 Wrote:(March 20, 2018 at 12:39 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: For me, if you are talking about a time before time, then you are using the word in two different ways. Referring to a period of time, or in this instance a period where there was no time.
using the term 'period' in this context assumes the existence of time. I am NOT talking about a 'time before time' as that would be nonsense. I am talking about a *start* to time. So, there was no time before that at all. The before' is not even applicable. Which is why causality is also nonsense in context.
No just assuming a period without time. You might consider it logically prior to time.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
