Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[polymath257]

using the term 'period' in this context assumes the existence of time. I am NOT talking about a 'time before time' as that would be nonsense. I am talking about a *start* to time. So, there was no time before that at all. The before' is not even applicable. Which is why causality is also nonsense in context.

No just assuming a period without time.  You might consider it logically prior to time.

That also makes no sense. The term 'period' assumes a duration, hence it assumes time.

As for being 'logically prior', that is also a meaningless phrase in context. Logic doesn't have a causal relationship with anything in the real world since it is a *language* we use to describe the real world.