Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 29, 2024, 12:58 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Another hypothetical for theists.
#85
RE: Another hypothetical for theists.
(March 24, 2018 at 5:49 am)Grandizer Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 11:37 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Which part do I disagree with?

He doesn't want to grant that this world is more likely under naturalism than under theism. Since this is the case, the implication (according to his dismissal) is that the fantasy world you describe is not more likely under theism than under naturalism.

To make sense out of this, here's some basic (and simplified) elaboration:

We have two competing explanations of the kind of world we live in (i.e., a world that is with bloodshed and killing, lots of bloodshed and killing). One that posits a deity (theism) and one that doesn't (naturalism)

For each of these explanations, there are two possible outcomes and two likelihoods to consider:

First outcome: World with bloodshed
Second outcome: World without bloodshed

For each of the competing ideas (theism vs. naturalism), if the likelihood of one of the possible outcomes is P, then the likelihood of the other is 1-P. So, say, the likelihood of a world with bloodshed under theism is 60%, then the likelihood of a world without bloodshed under theism is 40% (100% - 60%).

According to Neo, the likelihood of a world with bloodshed is not lower under theism than under naturalism, but higher. This means that the likelihood of a world with bloodshed under naturalism (call it P') is lower than 60%, which means that the likelihood of a world without bloodshed is higher than 40% under naturalism (higher than the one under theism).

Is this reasonable? You're saying that such a world without bloodshed would be impossible under naturalism (an extreme which, by the way, should be avoided unless you can demonstrate that such a world is logically impossible under naturalism, but I digress), but Neo is arguing (most likely unknowingly) that it not only is possible, but likelier under naturalism than under theism.

Youre either trying to be misleading, or you misunderstood what both he and I said.

He was talking about a world where God didn't exist at all (an atheistic world). Since we believe God is the creator of everything, we think the world wouldn't exist in the first place if God didnt. Obviously I agree with that, and was not saying otherwise on my post.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Another hypothetical for theists. - by ignoramus - March 22, 2018 at 3:55 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2018 at 4:12 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Pat Mustard - March 22, 2018 at 7:41 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by vulcanlogician - March 22, 2018 at 7:45 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by emjay - March 22, 2018 at 11:23 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Whateverist - March 22, 2018 at 2:42 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2018 at 7:14 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by RoadRunner79 - March 22, 2018 at 7:09 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Edwardo Piet - March 22, 2018 at 7:30 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 22, 2018 at 8:24 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 22, 2018 at 10:04 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by brewer - March 22, 2018 at 8:41 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2018 at 9:05 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 22, 2018 at 9:50 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by RoadRunner79 - March 22, 2018 at 9:55 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 22, 2018 at 1:10 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 22, 2018 at 10:16 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Losty - March 22, 2018 at 9:38 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by possibletarian - March 23, 2018 at 3:38 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 22, 2018 at 1:07 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Edwardo Piet - March 22, 2018 at 9:38 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 22, 2018 at 3:34 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 22, 2018 at 9:25 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 22, 2018 at 10:24 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Edwardo Piet - March 22, 2018 at 9:40 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by ignoramus - March 22, 2018 at 5:53 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 22, 2018 at 10:38 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 22, 2018 at 11:27 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by RoadRunner79 - March 22, 2018 at 11:42 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 22, 2018 at 11:45 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by ignoramus - March 22, 2018 at 11:50 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 22, 2018 at 11:55 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 12:54 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 23, 2018 at 9:18 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 10:02 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 23, 2018 at 10:09 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 23, 2018 at 10:37 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 11:31 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 23, 2018 at 12:45 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 3:52 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 23, 2018 at 5:40 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 9:54 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Succubus - March 24, 2018 at 7:13 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 24, 2018 at 9:04 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 24, 2018 at 1:24 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 24, 2018 at 9:24 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 23, 2018 at 7:02 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 23, 2018 at 7:29 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 10:02 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 23, 2018 at 3:15 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 23, 2018 at 11:23 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Whateverist - March 23, 2018 at 3:24 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 23, 2018 at 3:35 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Whateverist - March 23, 2018 at 3:39 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 23, 2018 at 3:42 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 23, 2018 at 6:43 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 23, 2018 at 6:54 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by ignoramus - March 23, 2018 at 7:05 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by ignoramus - March 23, 2018 at 8:43 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 23, 2018 at 9:46 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 23, 2018 at 10:08 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 23, 2018 at 11:37 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 24, 2018 at 5:49 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 24, 2018 at 11:55 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Grandizer - March 24, 2018 at 12:26 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Catholic_Lady - March 24, 2018 at 2:18 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by possibletarian - March 23, 2018 at 11:39 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Godscreated - March 23, 2018 at 1:45 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Amarok - March 23, 2018 at 9:30 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by PaulieLoafer - March 23, 2018 at 10:20 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by I_am_not_mafia - March 23, 2018 at 10:39 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Amarok - March 23, 2018 at 11:10 am
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by drfuzzy - March 23, 2018 at 6:36 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Amarok - March 23, 2018 at 6:44 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Amarok - March 23, 2018 at 9:58 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Amarok - March 23, 2018 at 10:05 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Amarok - March 24, 2018 at 1:00 pm
RE: Another hypothetical for theists. - by Neo-Scholastic - March 24, 2018 at 2:11 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  just another god hypothetical ... ignoramus 55 9579 July 14, 2021 at 3:59 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Constructing the image of the hypothetical God Aegon 9 2152 February 5, 2016 at 7:39 pm
Last Post: comet
  Questions for theists (and ex-theists, too) Longhorn 15 5272 April 23, 2015 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: orangebox21
  Theists: What makes your claims right and the claims of other theists wrong? Ryantology 29 8901 March 21, 2014 at 9:59 am
Last Post: Phatt Matt s
  Another Prayer Question For Theists BrianSoddingBoru4 40 14991 August 6, 2013 at 7:49 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  A Jesus hypothetical Gooders1002 7 2669 December 16, 2012 at 6:15 am
Last Post: Justtristo



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)