RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 25, 2018 at 7:54 am
It may be noted, that Grandizers theory is testable. If I am trying to avoid discussion, then all one would have to do, is present questions or arguments concerning either to what I had said or present an case for what you think is more compelling. If he is correct, and I want to avoid logical and coherent objections, then it would follow that I would continue to do so. I will note , that mere disagreement is not avoidance. If however I don't have issue with interacting with other ideas, then it would seem that the seemingly self serving hypothesis would be false.
I do avoid some topics. I try to avoid topics that are largely subjective or a matter of opinion. I may avoid a topic, because I don't think the person will contribute anything of value or has a history of just attacking the person or name calling; rather than thoughtful discussion. However this is a topic I like.
By a show of hands, if I said that an elephant suddenly appeared in my back yard (like poof) without reason. How many would consider that plausible?
I do avoid some topics. I try to avoid topics that are largely subjective or a matter of opinion. I may avoid a topic, because I don't think the person will contribute anything of value or has a history of just attacking the person or name calling; rather than thoughtful discussion. However this is a topic I like.
By a show of hands, if I said that an elephant suddenly appeared in my back yard (like poof) without reason. How many would consider that plausible?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
