RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 25, 2018 at 8:56 am
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2018 at 8:57 am by LadyForCamus.)
(March 25, 2018 at 8:45 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: RoadRunner, you have a problem with your argument. Kalam supports any deity of choice. Yahweh, Allah, Odin whatever. You have no option but to accept that gods which are not yours must also exist.
Oh, well that’s where the science and math talk ends, and the “testimony as evidence” argument begins. 😇
(March 25, 2018 at 8:18 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(March 25, 2018 at 7:57 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: *sigh*
It’s like the last 15 pages never happened and we have to start all over. I imagine this is why atheists get bored with debating after a while.
I admit, that I was having a bit of fun there, and I didn't expect that anyone would agree with that or that this represents their position. But if we get rid of the principle of sufficient reason, then why not? If things can begin to exist without cause, then what would limit an elephant from appearing without cause? Given enough time and chance, isn't anything possible?
Lol, what are you talking about?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
