Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[Amarok]

Lol is road honestly arguing that things on have meaning if they exist as spooky platonic magic entities rather then highly accurate descriptions of material things .

---

This is so far away from disproving Odin that I think we can conclude no theists can do it. So hopefully they can at least acknowledge that asking an atheist to disprove “god” is a silly thing to do.

Why do you think the argument has moved to the KCA? The moment things get too hot for the religionists they change the subject to something nebulous where they can bury the awkward questions with loads of noise. For example, when it finally dawned on Huggy that language and religion weren't the same thing he suddenly started talking out of the blue about how abiogenesis was a fantasy.

Standard apologist  tactic