RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 29, 2018 at 2:07 pm
(This post was last modified: March 29, 2018 at 2:08 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 28, 2018 at 12:17 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(March 18, 2018 at 9:56 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Again if you're going to call the man a liar your going to have to provide proof other than insinuations because his claims are too fantastical for you to believe.
And I find interesting that the only source you're using is one with a clear agenda and zero objectivity.
Would you be convinced if I started posting info from a flat earth website?
So, this is really interesting, and relevant to the OP.
On the one hand, you accept the extraordinary testimony of a priest that a light is god, and you accept the extraordinary testimony of a miraculous healing, but you do not accept mundane testimony that a man was seen faking his crutches, and you do not accept Upshaw’s own testimony that he hadn’t been bed or wheelchair bound for twenty years, which would make Branham a liar. So, testimony is sufficient evidence only when it confirms your pre-conclusions? Got it.
You've provided no testimony / proof stating that Upshaw has been faking a disability for 66 years. I find your claim that a congressman would fake a disability for 66 years in order to claim a miraculous healing to be just plain irrational.
While were at it, was FDR faking polio also?
