RE: Thought police?
April 5, 2018 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2018 at 3:19 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(April 5, 2018 at 2:13 pm)Shell B Wrote: So, in the case of the superimposing of a child's face over an adult pron star, I don't think that's victimless. If by some freak accident that kid some day sees that, it's fucked up. Using real people's faces, especially those who didn't consent, is an issue. Fake shit, as long as it's not disseminated, is no problem for me. It would seriously fuck with my head to see it or hear about it. I'd probably react very emotionally in the case of a realistic bot, but I don't think it harms anyone. Now, there may be such a thing as harming a robot on a human level in the future. I don't know. If there is, I'll reassess.
I agree with you.
The case of a real child's face is definitely harmful.
What I'm wondering is whether 'child sex bots' would encourage or discourage the likelihood of such people wanting to move onto real children... or whether it would have no effect on it whatsoever. Would it satisfy their urges so much that they would never harm a child when without those bots they would? Or would it keep them occupied for a while until they got bored and moved onto real children, after it actually fueling rather than satisfying their desires? Or would it have absolutely no effect because child molestation and pedophilia are completely unrelated?
(April 5, 2018 at 2:46 pm)Aegon Wrote:(April 5, 2018 at 6:02 am)ignoramus Wrote: Hey Zilla, I can just hear an Islamic Imam warning that:
IF YOU LEGALISE CHILD SEXBOTS, ONE DAY THEY WILL WANT TO MARRY THEM!
hehe
I think the slippery slope argument here would be more along the lines of: they get a taste of the simulation, now they're more inclined to desire the real thing and act on it.
Yeah this would be my biggest concern as well.
