Regariding the evidence for materialism

[Fred]

The evidence is very clear: behold.

There is not an elephant in my room.
Therefore, there is no elephant in my room.

It doesn't get more logical than that.

Uh, perhaps, but logic aside, there's a really big elephant in your room.

If something is not represented by a physical aspect, it does not exist. List ONE thing that DOES exist without a physical aspect, which you have proven exists, and this argument will be void. Good luck.

Logic isn't material and yet the really real logical truth DOES exist that if all square circles are triangular in shape, and a rectangle is a square circle, then it will be triangular in shape, and there isn't a physical aspect to triangular square circles last I checked.

Represented by is not the same as reduced to.