(September 5, 2011 at 1:48 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Perhaps you should work on communicating your ideas more clearly. Just tell me where I've misunderstood and it'll all be better. I'd rather strangle the ideas you hold than the ones you don't.
Downbeatplumb are you kidding me? what am I supposed to garner from that 5min excerpt, I'm going to have to watch all of it now before I come back and verbally bash you with it.
Ok bunny in roughly 8 years the James Webb Space Telescope will be going up and should give the best pic yet of distance and detail of the universe we've had yet to date.
The oldest star is the HE 1523 which is 13.2 billion years old-just slightly younger than 13.7 billion year age of the universe.
If that new telescope finds anything older (which I believe it will) that is a sledge hammer to the current theory.
Lets be honest on today's calculations alone there are sextillion stars etc, if the Universe is 13.7 Billion how many stars is that per year being made? work that out.
So no one has to die before that bit of evidence comes into play.
