(April 30, 2018 at 10:46 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(April 30, 2018 at 10:07 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: Watching/making porn and believing women are sexual objects are two different things.
Right. But you said this (my bold):
(April 30, 2018 at 9:27 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: And some people believe, that women are sexual objects. So if you get to tell people that voices in their head might be real, even though that can worsen their potentially dangerous condition, why can't misogynists indulge their fantasies, disregarding the potential harm it may cause to some individuals?
....My subsequent posts have been in response to that, and what I've been doing is explaining why believing women are objects is not comparable to believing demons exist.
I think that's just semantic nit-picking. Believing that demonic possessions are possible means believing that at least in some cases a person displaying symptoms of mental illness is in fact possessed by devils. That's what the bible says and that's the position of your church.
In the same way - a person can think that SOME women are sexual objects (you know - the "sluts" and the "whores"), but not the good ones, like their family members, or - I don't know - Queen Elizabeth II.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
