(September 5, 2011 at 6:09 pm)Ryft Wrote: All of it, because it is so incoherent it makes my head hurt. As I have said more than once—even though once ought to have been enough—presuppositional apologetics does not argue from logic to God, but from God to logic.
Exactly. You beg the question.
Quote:evidential apologeticsNow there's an oxymoron akin to "military intelligence", "jumbo shrimp" and "honest used car salesman".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
