I'm writing an essay that basically is arguing against everything I believe in both while a Deist and now as a Muslim, about morality.
I am going the Devil's advocate route.
Basically I want to be able to justify illicit relationships of any kind as well as having a sex with a real live bear by a woman but not universally, but just in her particular case.
What I can't argue that is that all society should do that. So I will be arguing that morality is dynamic, it depends on the state and knowledge of the individual and their thought process, their strengths and weakness, and there is no universal way nor is there a static way that everyone has to adhere to.
I have a lot of arguments for it, but I'm interested to hear thoughts here.
The essay context is of a book called "Bear".
I am going the Devil's advocate route.
Basically I want to be able to justify illicit relationships of any kind as well as having a sex with a real live bear by a woman but not universally, but just in her particular case.
What I can't argue that is that all society should do that. So I will be arguing that morality is dynamic, it depends on the state and knowledge of the individual and their thought process, their strengths and weakness, and there is no universal way nor is there a static way that everyone has to adhere to.
I have a lot of arguments for it, but I'm interested to hear thoughts here.
The essay context is of a book called "Bear".
