(May 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm)Khemikal Wrote: I think that's going to be an unnecessarily difficult lift, personally. You'll be arguing for complete moral relativism.
No, it won't. It's arguing for dynamic morality, not that everyone can decide morality, but that it changes person to person, state to state, condition to condition.
Relative morality would be everyone decides what their morality is, or do I got it wrong?