RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 4, 2018 at 5:29 am
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2018 at 5:29 am by vulcanlogician.)
(May 4, 2018 at 5:00 am)CDF47 Wrote:(May 4, 2018 at 4:37 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: Ignoramus has a point OP. Just because something is complex and intricate does not necessarily mean it has a creator.
Be careful posting links. We have a 30/30 rule which means no links until you've been here 30 days, made 30 posts. BUT, your links were put there to support your argument so they might not get snipped. Just for future reference. Here's da rules btw. All pretty standard stuff, really. https://atheistforums.org/rules.php
Thanks for the rules information. I did not know that and I am not here to break any of the rules.
DNA is not just complex. It is highly sophisticated. It is both extremely complex and precisely specific. There is no such thing as junk DNA anymore. It turns out that what was called junk DNA actually acts like a computer operating system. At least 85 percent of DNA performs these functions and 3 percent perform coding based on the latest figures I heard. It is now called non-coding DNA. I would post a link but I am not allowed but there is plenty of information about it on the Internet.
Again, though. Look at Iggy's snowflake. Elegant and symmetrical "design"... but we know how they form. BTW, you can post links if they support your argument. Read the rules. Just don't go hog wild for your first 30 days and maybe spend some time arguing points in your own words and not post links willy-nilly and you'll be okay.
Also, why don't you post a thread in the introduction forum? Tell us about yourself, what you think of atheism, and why you joined the forums.
Arguing biology ain't my cup o' tea, but if you post in the philosophy forum I might have something substantive to say. Again, pleasure meeting you.