CDF47 Wrote:Information always comes from a source (a mind or intelligence) that we know of.
Again, you're asserting what you ought to be supporting.
What you're basically saying is 'All the X we've seen up until now has been caused by W. Here is a new X that is not clearly caused by W. But we know X is caused by W, so this X must be caused by W as well.'
It's not a very good argument, and it doesn't help that in this case the X in question (DNA) is quite dissimilar in important ways from the previous X's it's being compared to (language, computer programs, human artifacts).
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.